The
New Product Development Process
Stage
2 – Idea Screening
The Second Stage of the New Product Development Process is
Idea Screening. It is described by Scott Edgett (1999, pg.510) as ‘the initial
go/no go decision where it was first decided to allocate funds to the proposed
new product idea’. Therefore this shows that in this stage, you analyse the
product or new sport format to decide whether it is a viable in both the short
term and long term. You will try to assess the impact it will have on the current
market and to assess if an investment in the product will show a return.
Christopher Easingwood (1986, pg.273) indicates that ‘The new product concept
would normally be evaluated by customer discussion groups’. This shows that it
is important to go out and test the market to see how well your new concept
would be taken to by the target market of the concept. You would also have to
approach potential sponsors and investors to see if they would be interested in
your new concept. At this stage you will also have to investigate how well a
new concept of a sport would fit into the market at the minute as well because
if the sport is already successful a new concept of the sport may not be appreciated.
An example of idea screening in action is the way the
England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) analysed how Twenty 20 cricket would
affect the market. They discovered that two thirds of the population either
hated cricket or had no interest in watching it. However, they discovered that over
half of the survey approved the idea of the shorter format and Martin
Williamson (2012) says the 34% of the people that approved the format had never
attended a match. Therefore, the ECB spotted a new market they could exploit
and Twenty 20 cricket has been a huge success.
In the last blog, two new concepts of sports were discussed
briefly and now in this blog we have analysed the two new concepts of golf and
Formula One. To find out which idea would be best to pursue further through the
new product development process and decision matrix was constructed and
analysed against five options which were: entertainment value, the investment
needed, chance of a participation boost, how popular the sport already is and
how long the event would last. When both
concepts were analysed it was decided that the concept of a relay F1 event
would be the best to pursue. In figure 1, we can see that it was believed that
the F1 relay would be more entertaining because it would be a quicker format
than already exists. However, it was also decided that the golf league had the
best chance to increase participation due to golf being more accessible. The
deciding factor though was how long the event would last and with the F1 relay
being a short format there would be a bigger chance of people taking to the
concept and watching it.
Figure
1 – A Decision Matrix
Weight
|
5
|
8
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
21
|
24%
|
38%
|
19%
|
14%
|
5%
|
100%
|
|
Option
|
Entertainment
Value
|
Investment
Needed in Project
|
Chance
of a Participation Boost in the Sport
|
Popularity
of the Sport
|
How
long the event would last
|
Score
|
Golf league
|
50
|
30
|
20
|
75
|
25
|
39
|
Relay F1
|
85
|
25
|
10
|
50
|
70
|
42
|
Reference
List
- Easingwood, C, J. (1986) ‘New Product Development for Service Companies’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(4), pg. 264-275.
- Edgett, S, J. (1996) ‘The New Product Development Process for Commercial Financial Services’, Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), pg. 507-515.
- Williamson, M. (2012) ‘Crash, bang and Pandora's Box is opened - The day the game of cricket was changed forever’, ESPN Cric info. [Online] Available at: http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/579245.html (Accessed: 18th November 2014)
Received
ReplyDeleteYou demonstrate a sound grasp of the idea screening concept and process, offering sound explanation to accompany an initial definition (which, while referenced - draws on dated sources). You treatment of 20/20 cricket as a sporting example is insightful, demonstrating a sound comprehension of the application of the screening process.
ReplyDeleteYou make good use of the decision matrix tool as a way of developing a viable idea in relation to your own proposed sports formats. Did you need more ideas?
68%
ReplyDelete